The 2014 Year End Newsletter looks at: I. Article 29 Working Party publishes Opinion on "Internet of Things" II. Data protection and competition law - statement by the Federal and State Commissioners for Data Protection III. Are IP-addresses personal data? - German Federal Court of Justice ask ECJ IV. Data processing for marketing: new guidelines V. Outlook on current draft laws and recommended reading   A brief summary of each point is below - to read the full newsletter, please click here.   I. Article 29 Working Party publishes Opinion on "Internet of Things" The WP29 considers IoT as generally permitted, but clearly states that any stakeholder is responsible for data protection. Despite of consent requirements and transparency obligations, personal data should be aggregated to the greatest extent possible and the principles of privacy by default and privacy by design shall be applied by the stakeholders. II. Data protection and competition law - statement by the Federal and State Commissioners for Data Protection While … Continue Reading ››
Just what IS the state of play on the draft Regulation? This was the hot topic at the recent IAPP conference in Brussels. The Datonomy Team has been taking stock of progress and has produced a guide to the Top 12 issues and their practical impact for business. Two weeks ago, members of the Datonomy Team attended the IAPP conference in Brussels. Despite the fact that the draft Regulation didn’t feature heavily on the draft agenda, it was the main topic of conversation between in house privacy counsel, regulators and private practice lawyers during the networking breaks. As Datonomy readers will be aware, the new Commission President has tasked the new EU Commissioners who now share responsibility for the data protection portfolio with steering inter-institutional negotiations on the text to agreement by May 2015. That would mean the Regulation would take direct effect in Member States by 2017. Over recent weeks, various sources … Continue Reading ››